{"version":"2.1.267","anchor":"numbered-list-detector-on-the-first-message-no-in-bundle-ca","canonical_anchor":"numbered-list-detector-on-the-first-message-no-in-bundle-ca","heading":"Numbered-list detector on the first message, no in-bundle caller found","tier":"internal","area":"Elsewhere","scope":null,"heads_up":null,"url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.267\/e\/numbered-list-detector-on-the-first-message-no-in-bundle-ca","release_url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.267","markdown":"### Numbered-list detector on the first message, no in-bundle caller found\n\nA new check detects numbered lists at the start of a conversation, though nothing yet appears to call it\n\n**Unclear.** No call site was found that actually invokes this numbered-list check, so it's unclear whether or how it currently affects behavior.\n\n**What**\n\nClaude Code now has a regular expression and function that check whether the very first message in a conversation starts a line with a numbered-list marker, like \"1.\" or \"1)\". No place in the code that actually calls this specific check with a message list could be found; other similarly-named functions in the code take a different kind of argument (a callback) and are unrelated.\n\n**Why**\n\nThis likely exists to decide whether to suppress a formatting nudge that normally discourages Claude from using numbered lists, based on whether the user's own first message already used one. Since no caller was found, it may not be active yet.\n\n- Area: Elsewhere\n- Tier: Under the hood\n- Useful: 1\/5\n- Signal: 2\/5"}