{"version":"2.1.265","anchor":"static-defaultsettings-fallback-now-tags-whether-it-was-arme","canonical_anchor":"static-defaultsettings-fallback-now-tags-whether-it-was-arme","heading":"Static defaultSettings fallback now tags whether it was armed by remote managed settings, and whether from cache","tier":"internal","area":"Managed Settings","scope":null,"heads_up":null,"url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.265\/e\/static-defaultsettings-fallback-now-tags-whether-it-was-arme","release_url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.265","markdown":"### Static defaultSettings fallback now tags whether it was armed by remote managed settings, and whether from cache\n\nThe static settings fallback log now says whether it came from remote managed settings, and whether it's an unverified cached copy\n\n**What**\n\nWhen Claude Code falls back to applying a static `defaultSettings` payload, the log message now says whether that payload was armed by remote managed settings, and if so, whether it came from a session cache that hasn't yet been verified this session, versus one that has.\n\n**Why**\n\nThis makes it easier to tell, from the logs, exactly which kind of fallback settings payload was applied and whether it's still awaiting verification, which matters when diagnosing unexpected settings behavior.\n\n- Area: Managed Settings\n- Tier: Under the hood\n- Useful: 1\/5\n- Signal: 1\/5"}