{"version":"2.1.248","anchor":"clearer-wording-when-a-call-was-auto-approved-but-reported-r","canonical_anchor":"clearer-wording-when-a-call-was-auto-approved-but-reported-r","heading":"Clearer wording when a call was auto-approved but reported refused","tier":"notice","area":"Remote Approvals","scope":null,"heads_up":null,"url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.248\/e\/clearer-wording-when-a-call-was-auto-approved-but-reported-r","release_url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.248","markdown":"### Clearer wording when a call was auto-approved but reported refused\n\nRefused cross-session calls now say the approval came from an automatic check, not a person.\n\n**What**\n\nWhen an automatic check inside the session had approved a cross-session call and an unverified sender then reports it was refused, the message now says explicitly that the approval came from an automatic check and not a person.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n`This session's automatic check (not a person) had approved the call to`\n\n- Area: Remote Approvals\n- Tier: You'll notice\n- Useful: 2\/5\n- Signal: 2\/5"}