{"version":"2.1.232","anchor":"clearer-wording-for-unsigned-remote-control-messages","canonical_anchor":"clearer-wording-for-unsigned-remote-control-messages","heading":"Clearer wording for unsigned remote-control messages","tier":"notice","area":"Remote Control","scope":null,"heads_up":null,"url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.232\/e\/clearer-wording-for-unsigned-remote-control-messages","release_url":"https:\/\/changelogs.core-directive.com\/v\/2.1.232","markdown":"### Clearer wording for unsigned remote-control messages\n\nUnsigned remote-control messages now say the message was ignored, not \"not executed\".\n\n**What**\n\nThe notice shown when a remote-control message arrives without a valid device signature now says the message was ignored, rather than that it was not executed.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n`arrived without a valid device signature (attestation: ${e.status}) and was ignored.`\n\n- Area: Remote Control\n- Tier: You'll notice\n- Useful: 1\/5\n- Signal: 1\/5"}